Fix typos in migrated GSoC posts

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/site/content/gsoc/otsu2018_4.typ b/site/content/gsoc/otsu2018_4.typ
index a5d01db..d0584f6 100644
--- a/site/content/gsoc/otsu2018_4.typ
+++ b/site/content/gsoc/otsu2018_4.typ
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 In the #link-self("gsoc/otsu2018_3")[previous part] I mentioned that reflectances reconstructed using this method can exceed the [0, 1] range and violate conservation of energy. Indeed, I could simply ask it for an imaginary color and get a weird, unphysical spectrum.
 
-What's interesting is that this doesn't happen in practice, when upsampling real data. Out of almost 1300 reflectances I tested, I found only one bad reconstruction. Using the original clustering, the result for `magenta` from `BabelColor Average` colorchecker reflects 100,6% of light at 730 nm. Clipping this value to 100% creates a tiny color difference, orders of magnitude smaller than the #link("https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-noticeable_difference")[just-noticeable difference].
+What's interesting is that this doesn't happen in practice, when upsampling real data. Out of almost 1300 reflectances I tested, I found only one bad reconstruction. Using the original clustering, the result for `magenta` from `BabelColor Average` colorchecker reflects 100.6% of light at 730 nm. Clipping this value to 100% creates a tiny color difference, orders of magnitude smaller than the #link("https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-noticeable_difference")[just-noticeable difference].
 
 #figure(
   img(static("gsoc/otsu2018_error.png")),