Differentiating code – addendum
This post describes how to the compute derivatives mentioned in an earlier post using Maxima, a computer algebra system. Code is listed in a monospaced font and answers are written directly below, in LaTeX. Ending lines with dollar signs in Maxima (instead of semicolons) surpresses the output, which is very useful for definitions.
Start by defining the reflectance model.
U: c_0 * lambda^2 + c_1 * lambda + c_2$ R: 1 / 2 + U / (2 * sqrt(1 + U^2))$
R with respect to
c_0. The expansion of
U appears a few times in the result. Substitute
U to simplify it. (The underscore is there so it doesn't expand back to the full expression.)
diff(R, c_0)$ subst(U_, U, %);
This can be further simplified by substituting . Unfortunately
subst won't recognize as so I recommend doing this manually.
Repeating the process for the other coefficients reveals a pattern. Let .
After skipping trivial derivatives, which can be easily done by hand, one will find themselves having to differentiate the final expression for . Normally an expression like (
diff(L, c_0)) would be treated as a derivative of a constant in Maxima and reduced to zero. One can use
depends to tell the program that the L*a*b* coordinates are functions of the model parameters. The result will then contain derivatives of the coordinates themselves.
An alternative approach is typing out the coordinates as functions explicitly. Instead of using
L(c_0, c_1, c_2) (and so on for
b) in the code below. The downside is that the function arguments will appear in the end result, cluttering it and making a mess.
depends([L, a, b], [c_0, c_1, c_2])$ delta_E: sqrt((L - L_target)^2 + (a - a_target)^2 + (b - b_target)^2)$
Use the same
subst trick as before to simplify.
diff(delta_E, c_0)$ subst(delta_E_, delta_E, %);
The other derivatives look the same. Simply substitute or for in the expression above to get obtain them.